نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، بخش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، دوبی- امارات
2 دانشیار بخش زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار، بخش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران،ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The content of comparative literature includes concepts that are valuable in human experience, and this concept has emerged from the comparative study of different texts that emphasize the elements of unity in diversity, and from the study of common concepts and their origins. Tragedy as a dramatic genre includes several parts of the introduction, crisis and knot, chorus, character, and ending. This structure has existed since ancient times as an Aristotelian model in a tragedy. Friedrich Schiller was one of the philosophers and poets who studied tragedy from the perspective of structure and internal content and presented his structural pattern in the face of the Aristotelian model of expression of development. Since both "Siavash" and "Hippolytus" have many similarities in terms of events and events for the hero, therefore, in this article, which has been done in an analytical-descriptive manner, the researchers have compared these two works with the approach of comparative literature based on Schiller's views. The method of collecting documents and sources in this article is library and in the end, it has been concluded that both the tragedies of Siavash and Hippolytus have the main components of a tragedy in the sense the introduction, successive conflicts, errors out of pride and youth, pitiful elements such as failure in life, unjustified accusations, migration to a foreign land, and at the end a tragic death, which according to Schiller, this diagram is a successful tragedy of The beginning of the story will be for the writer and the audience.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)