Hope and Despair in Amal Donqol and Siavash Kasraei’s Poems (A Semiotic Analysis of Time-Place and Myths Components)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student in Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

3 Associated Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

4 Associated Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Semiotics has provided researchers in the immediate past years with a tool for analyzing, understanding, and criticism of literary texts and discovery of hidden meanings. Semiotics has tried to unveil, decipher, and discover the deep meanings behind the structure. Amal Donqol (a contemporary Egyptian poet) and Siavash Kasraei (an Iranian poet) lived in their turbulent times. Political and social disorders intensively influenced the content and structure of their poems. The comparative semiotic study investigates meticulously and in detail the works of the Egyptian and Iranian poets considering hope and despair. It hopes to have a better and deeper understanding of the poets’ thoughts and spirits and their influence on their poems. Moreover, the study makes the ground for better presenting of the similarities and differences of their attitudes, as they live in rather similar conditions.
Using the semiotics of the application of time, place, and myths, the study investigated the duality of despair and hope  in some poems of the two poets regarding the structure and poetic language. It tried to answer the question that how despair and hope have been presented in the poems and in mentioned components and how their poetic and artistic manifestations are.
 

Method

 This descriptive-analytic study was done within the American framework of comparative literature.
 

Discussion

Semiology (or semiotics) is a new type of criticism that has had a great impact on literary studies and related research. This field of study interprets literary texts according to such criteria and layers as time, place, intertextuality, narration, character, etc. This study explored the place, time, and mythical characters to show the appearance of hope and despair in the selected poems. The components work as codes for the poet through which he shows his inner feelings and imposes positive or negative meaning upon them. The analysis of the signs unveils the hidden layers of meanings in a literary text and familiars readers with the world, thoughts, and feelings of its writer.
Time and place as signs and their signified are various and wide in literary texts and important for reading texts. The poets have used many words showing place and time. In many cases, adverbs showing the place in Donqol and Kasraei's poems lose the characteristic of being adverb of place and become a signifier having specific signifiers. The time adverbs have also been used in this way as their poems shows the change many times. The words become positively or negatively marked as they convey the poets’ feelings.  These words convey meanings different from their place and time meanings, which engages the readership with one of the dualities of despair or hope. Myth is also an important component that imposes meaning on the meaning in works of both poets. Using and recreating the myths, the poets communicate their ideals and spirits to the audience.
 
 

Conclusion

- The study investigated the duality of despair or hope in the poems of two poets based on the application of some components of the semiotics of time, place, and myths. The socio-political conditions that the two poets live in seem to be the same and their poems protest against their contemporary situation, but based on the mentioned examples one can say that when the poems have been composed, when death and despair were dominant in the mental space of poets, he optimistically expected a bright future, whereas death and despair are always dominant in Amal Danqol's poems.
- As a result of the different views of the poets, time, place, and myth have a hopeful and liberating application in the poems. In Amal's poems, however, the place, time, and myth components become nightmares of fear and failure, as a result of his sad and desperate creations.
- Finally, looking from semiotic analysis, it can be concluded that the fully optimistic and hopeful poems of Siavash Kasraei sometimes lack poetic fantasy and becomes similar to prose, making it a weakness of the poems. On the contrary, Amal Danqol's poems, though exaggerates in expressing darkness, they are totally strong and surprising sometimes regarding poetic beauties, creating new meanings, and linguistic deviations.
 
-

Keywords

References

References [In Arabic]
Abbas, I. (n.d.). Trends of contemporary Arabic poetry. Kuwait, Kuwait: Alam al-Ma’rifa.
Abid, M. S. (2010). The space of the poetic world from the formation to demonstration. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Naynava.
Abuzian, F. M. (2017, May 12). The semiotics of textual interference in the poetry of Amal Donqol. The 3rd International Conference on Linguistic and Literary Studies. Al-Madinah International University, Malaysia.
Al-Dosari, A. (2004). Amal Donqol, a poet on the lines of fire. Doha, Qatar: Al-Ghisma al-Arabia li Dirasat va al-Nashr. 
Al-Fakhuri, H. (2001). The history of Arabic Literature. Tehran, Iran: Tous.
Al-Maghalih, A. A. (1987). An introduction to poetic works of Amal Dangul. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Maktaba Madbouly.
Amin-Moghaddasi, A., & Salemi, M. (2020). The effect of 1967 defeat on Amal Donqol's poems, a research based on Michael Riffaterre's semiology. Studies on Arabic Language and Literature, 11(31), 1-22.
Ashri Zaed, A. (1978). Exploring traditional characters in contemporary Arabic poetry. Tripoli, Libya: Al-Shirka al-Amma li Nashr va al-Towzi’.
Ashri Zaed, A. (1980). Using Arab heritage in our contemporary poetry. Journal of Al-Fosool, 1, 203-220.
Donqol, A. (2012). Comprehensive works. Cairo, Egypt: Dar al-Shorugh.
Hilal, A. (2009). The manifestation of world in Amal Dongol's poems. Kafr El-Shaikh, Egypt: Al-Ilm va al-Iman li Nashr va al-Towzi’.
Hossein, Kh. (2000). The poetry of place in new novels (the narrative discourse of Edward al-Kharrat as a case). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Al Yamamah Institution.
Ibn Khallikan, A. Sh. (1997). Vafayat al-A’yan va Abna’ al-Zaman. Vol. 2. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Sadir.
Najafi Ivaki, A., & Vakili, Z. (2013). Semiotics of the last words of Spartacus. New Critical Arabic Literature, 3(4), 172-204.
Soalemia, A., & Sarwaty, M. (2018). Semantic fields in Amal Donqol’s poetry (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Eloued, Algeria.
 
References [In Persian]
Ahmadi, B. (1992). From visual signs to text. Tehran, Iran: Markaz.
Ahmadi, B. (2001). Interpretation and the structure of text. Tehran, Iran: Markaz.
Barahani, R. (1992). Gold in copper. Vol. 2. Tehran, Iran: Moalef.
Chandler, D. (2008). Basics of semiotics (M. Parsa, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Soureh.
Chevalier, J., & Gheerbrant, A. (2006). A dictionary of symbols. Vol. 4. (S. Fazaeli, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Jeihoun.
Choghazardi, A. (2007). Symbols of resistance literature in Donqol’s poems. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Farhangi, S., & Yousofpour, M. (2010). Semiotics of Alephbaye dard composed by Gheisar Aminpour. Kavoshnameh, 11(21), 143-165.
Ghaderi, A., & Seyyedi, S. H. (2020). A semiotic reading of the poetic language of Amal Donqol, adopting a layered approach: A case study of the Qasida ‘Al-Buka’ Bayna Yaday Zarqa’ al-Yamama’. Arabic Language and Literature, 12(1), 60-76.
Ghanavati, M. (2010). Human beings in the contemporary poetry with an emphasis on the Sohrab Sepehri, Nader Naderpour, Siavosh Kasraei, and Simin Behbahani’s poems. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ghobadi, H. (1996). Exploring the common epic and mystic signs in Persian Literature with an emphasis on Shahnameh and Rumi’s works. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
Ghobadi, H., & Kolahchian, F. (2007). Analysis of hope and despair in Rumi’s thoughts and stories. Literary Research, 4(17), 149-176.
Guiraud, B. (2001). Semiology (M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Agah.
Hassanli, K. (2007). Innovation types in contemporary poetry of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Sales.
Heidari, H., & Farzaheh, F. (2015). Symbolic application of ritual-mythical names and beliefs in Siavash Kasraei's poems. Persian Language and Literature of Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, 7(22), 1-30.
Kasraei, S. (2012). A collection of Poems (from Ava to Havayeh Aftab). Tehran, Iran: Markaz.
Makaryk, I. R. (1905). Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: Approaches, scholars, terms (M. Mohajer & M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Agah.
Naseri, N., & Ghoreishi, M. (2013). The manifestation of despair and hope in Shiavash Kasraei’s poems. Journal of Baharestan Sokhan, 9(11), 37-56.
Nejadkhalili, M. (2017). Manifestations of freedom and patriotism in contemporary African poets’ thoughts (A case study of Amal Donqol, Moufdi Zakaria and Muhammad al-Fayturi). (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
Sadri Koupaei, A. (2015). Exploring the presence of myths Isis and Osiris in contemporary Arabic poetry (with emphasis on Salah Ab al-Sabour, Amal Donqol, and Samih al-Ghasem’s poems) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kashan University, Kashan, Iran.
Safavi, K. (2015). An introduction to semiotics of literature. Tehran, Iran: Elmi.
Salimi, A., & Choghazardi, A. (2009). Symbols of resistance in contemporary poetry of Egypt (Case study: Amal Donqol). Journal of Resistance Literature, 1(1), 71-88.
Taherinia, A., Molla Ebrahimi, E., & Elyasi, H. (2020). A critical semiotic analysis of Amal Donqol “Al-Asha al-Akhir” based on the textual and metaphorical method of Fairclough and the method of action analysis of Theo van Leeuwen. Journal of Arabic Literature, 12(2), 1-22.
Tolouei Azar, A., & Haghbin, Sh. (2010, October 19). The analysis of the poetic collection of Siavash Kasraei’s Arash Kamangir based on “hope” theme. The National Conference on Myth. Iranian Association of Language and Literature. Arak, Iran. [In Persian]
Zamiran, M. (2004). An introduction to semiotics of art. Tehran, Iran: Gheseh.
Journal of Comparative Literature
Volume 14, Issue 27
Current Issue
Volume 14, Issue 27
February 2023
Pages 333-353

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics