A Comparative look to the Recall method of Personality of Halaj in the poem Shafi'ee kadkani and Salah Abdul Sabour

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of of Persian language and literature, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

 
 1- Introduction
The tendency to call them myths and invoke them in modern art has many reasons: the return to spirituality, the liberation of material time and the attempt to overthrow it, the creation of pluralism by modernity, the ambiguity and multiplicity of work are among the reasons for this tendency. Contemporary artist expresses his thoughts and emotions in the veil of myths in order to relieve the suffering he suffers, “because myths are inherently better off than the sacred and the eternal, because of their two distinctive and intrinsic elements of aesthetics and emphasis on the sacred. Fill these gaps for contemporary man. (Qasimzadeh, Ghobadi, 1391: 40) And since "mythical mind is the mind of the creator" (Biden, 1386: 167) Mythical poets, with creative expression, create a new world and dynamism for literature, they provide with Symbolic, ambiguous, fluid and polyphonic expressions that are specific to the myth attempt to establish the "ideal order of the myth" (Kupp, 1384: 41) in the turbulent world of their age. Contemporary poets have come to the realization that the decline of sacred affairs is one of the most destructive of modern times, and have invoked national and human myths, calling for the disguise of dissident figures such as, inadvertently, and in fact, embodied in reality. It is the age of modernity. "The concepts that the poet seeks to instill and understand through the use of myth are human cultural and intellectual meanings or political concepts that the poet does not want or cannot express directly and explicitly.
 
2- Methodology
In this article, we have tried to first define and analyze the method of invoking the masquerade style in contemporary poetry, and then, in a comparative way, to investigate the application of the masquerade style in the poetry of two contemporary Iranian and Egyptian poets, namely Shafi'i Kadkani and Salah Abdul Nassib The key point is to find out what the artistic and cultural implications of the call for traditional masks in contemporary poetry are and how there is a difference in the style of reading these masks between contemporary Persian and Arabic literature.
 
3-Discussion
The link between Arabic and Persian culture and language is so strong and long-lasting that it is impossible to separate the two. "The necessity of examining the links between these two languages ​​in literary, historical discourses on the one hand, and crossing cultural boundaries on the other, has doubled the need to address the common issues between the two languages. (Dadkhah, 125: 1386) Invoking the mythical, historical, literary, Sufi, folk, masquerading characters is one of the common boundaries of contemporary Arabic and Persian poetry. Invoking traditional personalities in the guise of sophisticated techniques in Arabic and Persian literature is therefore one of the necessities of comparative research. The issue raised in the present study is a comparative study of the appeal of the personality of Halaj in the poetry of two contemporary Arab and Iranian poets, Salah Abdul Sabour and Shafi'i Kadkani. After discussing the general issues of research, the main purpose of the study, namely, to explain and apply the method of summoning personality in modern poetry of these two contemporary poets. Recognizing the multidimensional characteristics of the solution personality, as well as the social, political and cultural needs of their community, these two poets have invoked this personality in a masquerading way to satisfy their own mental needs and, on the other, to Respond to the cultural needs of their community.
 
4-Conclusion
In contrast to the invocation of masquerade in Persian poetry and Arabic poetic dramas, what makes the difference is the first; that poetic plays have a more personalized character than contemporary Persian poetry and can incorporate several masks into Persian poetry. Because of the short structure of the poems, the opportunity for personalization is less important. Second, in disguising theatrical plays, language is a tool for another end and is changing with the characters of the play, but in contemporary Persian poetry, language literature is more valid. Thirdly, it is intended in the playful spirits of the playwright's spirits and avoids poetic artifacts, but in the non-visual poetry in which the mask is used, ambiguity and cryptography is a literary value. The ambiguity, "is the essence of pure and enduring literature, and for the literary context, value and virtue." (Fotouhi, 2008: 30: 30)

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

- Ahmadi.B. (2010). Structure and text interpretation. Tehran: Markaz Press.
- Ahmadiyan, H. (2002). "A lolk at Salah Abdalsabour's  life and poems with his works". Journal of Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran. No. 53. Autumn and winter. (163-164). Pages: 178-157.
- Adonis, A. (1991). Alsofiyeh and alsaryaliyeh.  Beirot: Dar alsaghi.
- Asvar, M. (2002). From the rain song until the Roses Psalms. Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Akbari beiragh, H & Sanaee, N. (2012). "A Comparative Study of Poetry and Thought. SS. Eliot and Ahmad Shamlou on the Principle of Modernity". Journal of Comparative Language and Literature Research, Volume 3, No 4, Pages: 43-66.
- Bedoen, J. (2003). "Mask". (J. Sattari, Trans). Show Magazine, No 72, Pages: 66-69.
- Bashardost, M. (2000). In search of Neyshabur. "Tehran: Sales Press.
- Bidni, D. (2007). (B. Mokhtariyan, Trans). "Myth, Symbolism and Truth. Journal of Organon". No 4, Pages:161-181.
-Palmer, M. (2009). Freud, Jung, and Dean, (M. Dehganpoor & G. Mahmoodi.). Tehran: Roshd Press.
-Poornamdariyan, T. (2001). In the shade of the sun. Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Poornamdariyan, T. (2011). Travel in Fog.  Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Towfigh Beizon, H. (2014). Salah Abd alsabour. Beirot: Dar alkotob alelmieh Press.
- Johns, E and Others. (1987). Mystery and the like in psychoanalysis.  (J. Sattari, Trans.). Tehran: Tous Press.
- Dadkhah, H & Jamshidi, l. (2007). “Comparative Study of the Dialogue Element in Hariri and Hamidi Authorities". Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University. Volume 26. No 2, Pages: 125- 143.
- Daad, S. (2004). Culture of literary terms.  Tehran: Morvarid Press.
- Sattari, J. (2010). The world of mythology (Myth in the Arab and Islamic world). Tehran: Markaz Press.
- Shamloo, A. (2013). Workshop 1: The Poems. Tehran: Negah Press.
- Shafieei kadkani, M. (2001). Contemporary Arab Poetry. Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Shafieei kadkani, M. (1997). Second millennium deer. Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Shafieei kadkani, M. (2009). A mirror for sounds. Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Shafieei kadkani, M. (2009). "Our Master Adib's Character". Bukhara Magazine, No. 71, pages: 31-62.
- Sholts, D & Sholts, S. (2012). Theories of personality.  (Y. Sayyed Mohammadi, Trans). Tehran: Virayesh Press.
- Abbas, E. (2005). Approaches to Contemporary Arab Poetry.  (H. Abbasi, Trans). Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Abbasi, H. (2008). Rain Travelogue.Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Abbasi, H. (2006). "The function of the masks in poetry (with the analysis of two masks in M. Sereshk poetry)". Journal of Mashhad Faculty of Literature and Humanities. No. 152, Pages: 155-173.
- Abdalsabour, S. (1998). Aldivan. (Third volume).  Beirut: Dar aleeodah Press.
- Abdalsabour, S. (2006). Complete religious practices. Beirot: Dar aleeodah Press.
- Arab.A. (2004). Adonis in contemporary Arab poetry and criticism. (S, H, Sayyedi. Trans). Mashhad: Ferdowsi Press University.
- Asgarzadeh Torghabeh, R. (2010)." Character Analysis in Poetry Letters T.S. Elliott". Journal of Language Studies and Translation of Faculty of Literature and Humanities. No 1. Pages: 69-87.
- Attar Neishabouri,F, F. (1991). Tazkerat al Owliya. Tehrah: Tous Press.
- Fathi, E. (2007). Literary glossary. Beirot: Arab Institute for Studies and Publishing.
- Fotohi Rood Maajeni, M. (2008). "The value of ambiguity ranging from semantic to multidimensional". Journal of Faculty of Literature & Humanities, Tarbiat Moallem University
No. 62. Pages: 17-36
- Fotohi Rood Maajeni, M. (1999). Picture Rhetoric. Tehran: Sokhan Press.
- Ghasem Zadeh, S & Ghobadi, H. (2012). “The Reasons for Postmodernist Novelists to Revive Myths". Adab Pazhohi. No 21. Pages: 33- 61.
- Kazzazi, M. (1995).Maani, Tehran: Markaz.
- Larens, C. (2005) Myth. (M. Dehghani. Trans). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
- Kahnamoyee Poor, JHaleh & Rahbar, chitra. (2007). "A Study of the Reasons for Myth Readings in Twentieth Century French Theater". Contemporary World Literature Research, No. 37, Pages: 43-54.  
- Masinion, L. (1999). Four unpublished texts of the life of Hallaj. (GH, Mirakhori, Trans). Tehran: Yaad Avaran.
- Mirakhori, Gh. (2000). The tragedy of Hallaj in ancient texs. Tehran: Shafiee Press.
- Mirzaee, F & Others. (2010). "Khayyam's morbidity in the works of two Persian and Arabic poets: Salah Abdul Sabour and Nader Naderpour". Journal of Comparative Language and Literature Research, No 1, Pages: 159-177.
- Alex perminger & t.v.f. Brogan. (1993) the new Princeton Encyclopedia of poetry and poetics. Prinecton university press.
 
Journal of Comparative Literature
Volume 11, Issue 21
Current Issue
March 2020
Pages 277-303

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics